Donald Trump seems to be uniquely capable of attacking the media and using their own techniques against him. During the campaign his use of surrogates including the National Enquirer to smear Ted Cruz is an example of the type of warfare that is necessary to win elections. I am disgusted by the state of our country when it comes to the politics of personal distraction. That said gladiators in the rain battling lions and cheaters can only fight one way. In this case Donald Trump is fighting for us not against us. I would love an imaginary world where it's not necessary to smear your competition, that World does not exist. In the real world I'd rather have someone fighting on my side, no matter how dirty the fight is, instead of someone dying for principles and bleeding out on the ground. That person does us no good.
Unfortunately, I think Ted Cruz probably falls in the category of a murder. And while I love murders when it comes to my church, we don't need murders when it comes to our political party and aspirations as a people. The stakes are too high and the situation is way too tired for someone to and pillow themselves on a spear or submit to burning oil. Tearing of flesh by lions does not advance Our political idea logical and constitutional cause.
Protect cruise it's like playing chess against somebody else that has additional pieces on the board. You take their night and he simply replace it with the bishop. You take their queen and they get a new one. That's with going up against the media Democrat government academic Hollywood complex is like. And unless you're willing to battle them tooth and nail bloody and dirty you cannot defeat. I didn't see any clear indications that Ted Cruz was going to fight that way in the primary. This gives me can Searne that he wouldn't have been able to handle it in the general and certainly not as president. However in stark contrast Donald Trump was and is a streetfighter. And that's what's needed in our country today.
Likewise, because the media has extra pieces on the board they're willing to leak information through media sources to disparage distract and destroy anyone in the Republican Party. Whether it's a violation of law, ethics or simple to Coram nothing will prevent the Democrats from the low blows and punches to the grind that typically do real conservatives. Look at the way they attack marriages sexuality and families to destroy conservatives and Republicans. It's too easy to say that we need our politicians to be above board and above reproach. I agree, however you're still playing a game against an opponent that will stop at nothing to destroy you. And eating our own rather than circling the wagons the way Democrats do has proven ineffective to advance are needed reforms and regain our necessary freedoms. It is too far gone to stand on principle alone, the hill that I'm willing to die on is behind us. And right now we are advancing on the enemy.
This disproportionate asymmetrical war of information puts us at a disadvantage. We have no investigative reporters that are able to dig the way Woodward and Bernstein did in Watergate or liberal Democrats have done from Reagan to Bush and now to trump. However, when it comes to breaking the law Donald Trump benefits from the lawlessness of other nations and individuals when it comes to abiding by our electoral standards. Even if there was no collusion I guarantee that Donald Trump welcomes the packing and disseminating of true democrat collusion and corruption through WikiLeaks and other websites. That is the counterpunch to the liberal media complex.
It may be unfortunate that we come to a state of affairs where abiding by the laws of disadvantage. We need to get over that, this is warfare and they are doing whatever is necessary to win. Therefore, the rules in any fight or stop by the aggressor. And we need to counter back with our own changing rules of engagement when it comes to use a foreign intelligence gathering through a variety of means.
This may sound like situational ethics, however there's a difference between calling something wrong and recognizing its usefulness. Generally speaking it's wrong to kill people, but in warfare it's necessary. Generally speaking I would avoid shutting innocent life, but if enemy combatants use women and children as human shields it is their fault when their families die. And I'm willing to do what's necessary even if it includes collateral damage. And I'm not going to blink and I shut it here or lose a wink of sleep when it comes to the consequences of their actions. There are many situations where something that is generally wrong becomes needed given circumstances. We can answer for those Ella fax. People with a conscience will feel the sting of their decisions. However I can look myself in the mirror and recognize when I'm willfully pursuing the utilitarian line of the ends justifying the means, when I do finally ends as accomplishing a political agenda. Instead, when our end goal is promoting liberty freedom and personal responsibility, the nature of warfare in the revolutionary war the Civil War and World War II demand tough man make hard choices. We face the same consequences to in action today as our ancestors have in the past. There is no excuse for the milquetoast spineless weakness that allows our enemies to destroy us.
Instead, we must do anything and everything that's necessary to destroy them.
No comments:
Post a Comment